Sin Boldly
December 16, 2018·Money

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.
- The Bible, Galatians 5:23
God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and sin boldly.
- Martin Luther in a Letter to Philip Melancthon (1521)
I have a 2- and a 4-year old. They have taught me to revere lessons of self-control.
Now, there were three things my lifelong Texan wife and I knew we had to do immediately when we moved to Connecticut. We had to find a grocery store that sold Shiner Bock, we had to find a butcher who sold full packer cut briskets, and we had to find a restaurant that sold Tex-Mex style queso and another that sold chicken fried steak. Of all these tasks, the last was the hardest. You may not be familiar with the dish. Chicken fried steak – called ‘country-fried steak’ in places that make terrible chicken fried steak – is a steak that has been pounded flat and thin, dredged in a flour breading and pan- or deep-fried. It’s unclear whether its origin is more southern (in keeping with the name) and related to a very similar process for breading and frying chicken, or more related to the very similar schnitzel dishes that the many German immigrants to Central Texas would have brought with them. My money is on the latter. Chicken fried steak is basically Wiener Schnitzel, except that it is made from beef from cows a year or two older, usually without breadcrumbs in the breading, and with cream-and-pepper gravy instead of lemons and parsley. My undying thanks go to Adolphe, Grand Duke of Luxembourg, who sponsored the Verein zum Schutz(e) Deutscher Einwanderer in Texas, better known as the Mainzer Adelsverein, for the greatest unanticipated result of his patronage.

The best chicken fried steak I ever had was at a place called RO’s Outpost, a mediocre, now-closed BBQ joint in Spicewood, Texas that also pounded, breaded and fried an extraordinary steak to-order. Other very passable fresh preparations are available in places like Goodson’s in Tomball, Texas. But in most cases – even in Texas and the south – you’re going to get a frozen product distributed by Sysco. Maybe by PFG or US Foods. Sadly, your best bet is finding a restaurant that does the most consistent job of frying the flour-dredged, ‘naturally shaped’ version of a frozen steak. Sysco calls theirs the Angus Country Fried Steak. The most consistent version used to be at Chili’s, believe it or not, before most locations took it off the menu. The worst? An unnaturally shaped, low-end version served by the pseudosouthern Moxie and Charleston Chew sign-bedecked hellscape that is Cracker Barrel. Your best nationwide bet these days is at Louisville, Kentucky-based Texas Roadhouse.
So it happened that I took the family to a nearby Texas Roadhouse location, where my two sons decided to regale the restaurant with their newest trick, which is to combine toilet humor silliness with catchy songs. Their choice for all the other restaurant guests that day was the theme song to Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood, but one that replaced the word “neighbor” with a different, funnier word. Their flagship variant was “would you be mine, could you be mine, won’t you be my poopoo,” but there were as many others as there are two-syllable words for body parts or bodily functions.
So yes, even though I spent three paragraphs talking about fried ribeye steaks smothered in gravy, I AM, like every other exhausted parent of toddlers, a believer in the lessons of self-control. Or at least in the idea that it will, someday, emerge.
This goes double for my views as an investor.
I have written (in language stolen from Friedman) that investment returns are always and everywhere a behavioral phenomenon. There is very little that the average or professional investor can do to improve their thinking more than by becoming students of behavior, psychology and evolutionary biology. Some of those benefits may be gained by exploiting the recurring and predictable tendencies of other humans, although it is a thing much easier said than done. I still think that the greatest – and certainly most attainable - gains are to be had through awareness and command of our own tendencies. Through self-control.
But there’s a problem with this idea: self-control, at least as it manifests in our brains, is an imperfect tool for overcoming behavioral biases.
Most of self-control as we think of it works through mental models. We synthesize a lot of different ideas, concepts and experiences to build an abstracted idea of what acceptable behavior looks like. Then we (mostly) consciously enforce it on ourselves. Most of those concepts are moral standards or cultural norms. Limit your gluttonous consumption of fried beef, on the one hand, and don’t stand up in your chair at Texas Roadhouse to sing songs featuring your sexual organs at the top of your lungs, on the other. Reasonable enough. As investors, it is easy and helpful enough to incorporate aphorisms and heuristics into this conscious management of our own behavior. Be fearful when others are greedy, don’t play for lottery outcomes, be a seller of insurance after a hurricane, that kind of thing.
The problem is that the same mental models we create to self-audit and control our behavior are exactly the ones on which narratives work. The language of common knowledge is the language of normative thoughts.
When we write about the nudging oligarchy, we write about those with influence over common knowledge, who exert small pushes on our framework toward what they believe to be right behavior. Political and patriotic correctness are forms of this, too, seeking to exert explicit influence on the cultural norms we incorporate into our baseline to which acts of self-control would return us. Many narratives are just repurposed versions of ancient memes, and are themselves sources of behavior to be controlled by our awareness and capacity for self-control. But just as many seek to tell you how to think about what it means to be a good person. A positive social influence. A real investor. A real financial advisor. A real Graham & Dodd adherent or student of Buffett. These aren’t behavioral biases. They are attempts to change the baseline against which you measure behavioral deviation!
I’m not saying all those things are bad or that all the intentions behind those promoting them are evil. We are all trying to influence one another, after all. But if we, as investors, rely only on our self-control and discipline to navigate biases, even if we succeed (and we won’t), we remain susceptible to those who would change seek to change our measuring sticks.
There’s only one way around this tendency: we must be explicit in stating our principles, and we must convert those principles into process.
I think there’s another powerful benefit to this as well: the protection of a process to constrain bias allows our conscious thoughts to be much less constrained by the abstractions of socially constructed norms about investing. We are free to think dumb ideas, irrational-sounding ideas, absurd-seeming ideas.
To sin boldly.




Comments
Rusty Guinn: “There’s only one way around this tendency: we must be explicit in stating our principles, and we must convert those principles into process.”
Thoughts…The secret to productivity is managing energy not time. You can get more done in less time using the mental equivalent of high-intensity interval training: alternating between eustress sprints (hyperfocus, high arousal) and recovery (inward focus, low arousal) to prevent burnout.
To Sin Boldly…made me think of a post that so resonated with me long ago!
“Anyone who tries to sell you your own divinity is a scammer.
Anyone who tries to define you sees themselves your master.
Anyone who tries to punish or reward you sees themselves your master and wants you to accept that role. Your parents (and guardians) are often piloted by the blind forces of trauma patterns. What they do at these times is not parenting but seizures of madness, of which you are the audience and often the victim. This is not your fault, not your doing, and is not right. You are good to the core, but happen to be on the receiving end of these seizures.
This is true for every occurrence of unkindness, humiliation, or abusive interaction by a person who has power over you.
Sometimes it’s helpful to see beliefs, stereotypes, even language and habitual ways of thinking as forces that have colonized humanity. There’s space and life beyond these. Follow your curiosity about that dimension. It exists and is vast — infinitely more expansive than the mind’s ability to think.
Humanity/society is multilayered. The shittiest layers get most of the publicity. There are many, many awesome people living in integrity, creating with open hearts and rich imagination. You can be one of them; the easiest way is to join their communities and friendships.
Friendships are sacred, and deserve your utmost integrity, attention and honesty.
You’re good and you are able to recognize the people who have not broken/fallen to the dark side. Trust that.”
Continue the conversation…
This is really smart: “we must be explicit in stating our principles, and we must convert those principles into process.” My one humble caveat is that, even with a process, one has to leave room for decisioning in real time, in particular, in a three-body-market. As Ben notes in “Clear Eyes, Full Heart, Can’t Lose” (an incredible piece), there is no answer. It’s the reason this stuff is so very, very hard.
And this is really smart: “These aren’t behavioral biases. They are attempts to change the baseline against which you measure behavioral deviation!” No caveats from me.
I like a lot of these ideas. A lot. But after a decade of working in finance and interviewing hundreds and hundreds of people - job candidates, fund managers, financial company CEOs / CFOs - I’m not as convinced that it is possible to recognize good people. I don’t trust my instincts there. It’s a bit far afield for this note, but I don’t think the secret there is trusting that instinct. I think it’s a willingness to be vulnerable to the circumstances where that instinct proves wrong.
Rusty…I agree with those sentiments! Here’s what I know about people after spending over a decade in and out of Afghanistan and Iraq: I am pretty good at seeing the environment for what it trully is to include the people half hazardly walking thru it…I have faith in one thing, the only thing I have any modicum of control over, the TEAM of guys next to me. Those years in combat zones as a good friend reminded me of said, Mike and that decade was like Dog years," never thought of it that way but it was spot on. I do not trust pure instinct either, but I do when I back it up with data, changing conditions…things that most do not see! And after all of that experience of which I wish on no one…I am still an Optimist…in that I think humanity will eventually do the right thing and as Americans it’s usually the last damn thing and also I am a Skeptic…in that I fucking question everything, your internal Bullshit Detection Meter might be the single most important thing you can develop!
----break----
Great sentiments this morning in my am read…“The trouble with you son” said Bill Shankly once to a struggling young player “is that your brains are all in your head.” The great man had a point, and not just about football.
What I mean is that there are some things which we recognise intellectually but which we just don’t get in our hearts or guts. There are limits, therefore, to how far we can empathize with others’ views, even if we try (which, of course, many people don’t)"
Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...