Lack of Imagination

Rusty Guinn

March 14, 2020·27 comments·Money

A framework that sounds rational is guiding investors toward dangerous blindness. The models explaining why stocks shouldn't fall this far assume that economic shocks are temporary, isolated events. But what if the real damage isn't in the numbers two quarters out, but in the cascading failures across interconnected supply chains, the permanent shifts in consumer behavior, and the emergence of a new political consensus about decoupling from global trade? The gap between what these models measure and what's actually changing widens with each day.

  • The dominant valuation framework isolates a single variable: near-term cash flow damage. This creates a false sense of precision during a moment when the most consequential effects are unmeasurable and dependent on dozens of unknowable policy choices and behavioral shifts.
  • Economic damage doesn't flow in straight lines through a spreadsheet. When restaurants close, their suppliers lose customers. When those suppliers fail, local manufacturers lose inputs. When local manufacturers contract, the businessman who owns their building can't service his debt. These cascades are impossible to model but inevitable to experience.
  • A seismic shift in political rhetoric about globalization is emerging simultaneously. Politicians across three continents are suddenly discussing supply chain localization, reduced dependence on foreign production, and economic self-sufficiency. This narrative didn't exist before the crisis forced it into focus.
  • The market's decline reflects more than the pandemic's direct economic impact. Investors are reexamining assumptions about central bank intervention, the durability of inflated valuations, and whether other investors will remain as willing to hold expensive stocks. The catalyst exposed deeper vulnerabilities in what was being priced.
  • The investors who thrive won't be those who explained recent moves through deterministic models. They'll be those who can imagine how consumer behavior, regional economics, global trade relationships, and investor preferences might be permanently altered by two months of near-total economic disruption.

The Why of Epsilon Theory

  • Direct access to leading narrative-tracking technology across global news.
  • Deep analysis of how narratives shape markets, politics, and society.
  • An active online community of independent voters, investors and thinkers.
Subscribe to Premium
Already a member? Log in

Looking for Deeper Insights?

Unlock exclusive market intelligence, trade ideas, and member-only events tailored for investment professionals and active investors with Perscient Pro.

VISIT PRO
Spiral
Money
Money

Comments

Flat_Arthur's avatar
Flat_Arthurabout 6 years ago

Truly excellent work Rusty. My imagination goes in many directions, but many of them can be reduced down to one factor that does not seem to be priced in anywhere. Inflation.


Schase's avatar
Schaseabout 6 years ago

Rusty, this piece is a pleasure to read and, like your BBQ, I went back again to consume a second time. Many thanks! I’m surprised you didn’t mention passive strategies’ deterministic investing equation: cap-weighted ETF plus time equals 7% compounded returns (and an annuity stream for advisors). The opposite of imagination. What about an active manager who considers the limitations of historical performance due to the obvious need to consider U.S. political risk in risk budgets. Where in a Monte Carlo simulation do you insert monetary policy working as a political utility? Where in the capital asset pricing model is the footnote that points to what to do when the S&P 500 CBOE Implied Correlation achieves 90% - for the second time in 12 years! And in the value investing arithmetic that capex budgets have been replaced with opex budgets, and the cloud-based productivity software companies that drive innovation via opex (nothing short of a complete re-platforming of entire industries) themselves have balance sheets made up of intangibles. Would love to excavate more along these lines…


teddpotts's avatar
teddpottsabout 6 years ago

Truly excellent work Rusty. My imagination goes in many directions, but many of them can be reduced down to one factor that does not seem to be priced in anywhere. Statism.


Dano's avatar
Danoabout 6 years ago

Statism week is coming.


Dano's avatar
Danoabout 6 years ago

The new, new world order is here.


Flat_Arthur's avatar
Flat_Arthurabout 6 years ago

I agree so much that it is my avatar. Statism/de-globalization = the world is no longer “flat”. Game changer for inflation. Man, if only we could go back to the Thomas Friedman’s “flat world” for a while.


rguinn's avatar
rguinnabout 6 years ago

Over the medium-to-long term, we think that remains the horseman that requires the most imagination from us - by far.


rguinn's avatar
rguinnabout 6 years ago

You are right! There are so many analyses that have been cartoonified into a single decision or variable. You are also right that we could fill up a whole section of the site with them!


rguinn's avatar
rguinnabout 6 years ago

Absolutely a potential cousin to deglobalization that must be part of our imagination exercise.


rguinn's avatar
rguinnabout 6 years ago

Le roi est mort

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...

rguinn's avatarFlat_Arthur's avatarcartoox's avatarDano's avatarSolloway's avatar
+5
27 replies